The Countdown
January 14th, 2009The Countdown
Final Week
In less than 7 days we’ll have a new president.
It must be a pretty strange feeling to hold the most powerful position in the world one day, then wake up the next day as more-or-less just a regular guy.
I know that’s not exactly the case, but it must be almost as surreal as it is for the incoming president.
I disagree with both Bush and Obama on many topics, but I wish them both the best going forward.
New Day
November 5th, 2008New Day
Start Changing
Well, thank _________ (insert your desired deity here) this election is over. Sure, I would have preferred a different outcome, but just as I predicted, the world is still turning.
Right now I’m just ready to move on, focus on my on work and interests, see fewer campaign signs and buttons, and get on with life. It will be a quick two years and then it will start all over again.
Good luck President-elect Obama. You’ve got a big job ahead of you.
Follow The Leader
September 25th, 2008Follow The Leader
Not Hard To Spot
Our nation is in the midst of a financial crisis.
Make no mistake about it, the current state of the financial market is closer to collapse than it has been at any time over the past 75 years.
At the time of a national – or in this case international – crisis, you’ll see the true character of people.
There are the Leaders, which head directly to the heart of the crisis, and put every effort into working toward a solution that will resolve the crisis. These are the “take charge” people. While not everyone will agree with their solution to any certain crisis, and while their actions may not always work, at least they are decisive and leading.
The others, of course, are the Followers. Followers have their place, and are just as important as Leaders, in their own way.
A General can create the most masterful plan for a battle, but without the troops, he won’t win.
The job of the President of the United States, however, requires a leader. Not someone that will follow polls, public opinion, or panels of advisers. No, it requires someone who will head straight for the center of the battle, or crisis, and lead… decisively.
Senator McCain has already suspended his campaign to fight this financial crisis in Washington, D.C. – and he is the one person who will be able to bring the two sides together – or close enough to make each side equally unhappy – so that an agreement can be made and the country can move forward.
Senator Obama has already declared his position as a follower, but has made himself “available” to the people of the country, by advising his counterparts in Washington to “call me if you need me”, while he continues to pursue his own self-interests while focusing on his campaign.
I don’t want a person “leading” our country who will be “available if we need them”. I want a person leading the country who will have already taken charge of things that I’d rather not have to lose sleep over.
We all talking about the potential collapse of our nation as we know it. Anyone who doesn’t see the depth of the financial crisis that we’re in, anyone who doesn’t see clearly how this is going to affect them, their children, and grandchildren, needs to revisit economics 101.
The actions of the two candidates over the past couple of days only solidifies my support of Senator McCain, the only choice if you want a true Leader leading our nation.
Obamanation
September 20th, 2008Obamanation
Two Steps Back
On rare occasions, someone will summarize my thoughts even better than I can myself. Certain things that I may be thinking, but haven’t yet found the right words to express them verbally.
Today I’ll give that virtual podium to Rupert Murdoch, chairman and CEO of News Corp., regarding the fear that many of us have about Senator Obama’s economic platform.
In an interview on Friday, Mr Murdoch said:
“I am very worried. “I like Sen. Obama very much. I have met him. He is a very intelligent man. But his policy of anti-globalization, protectionism, is going to be — and card checks — are going to do two or three things. It’s going to give us a lot of inflation. They’re going to ruin our relationships with the rest of the world. And they are going to slow down the rest of the world, too. And they’re going to make people frightened to add to employment. You are going to find companies leaving this country if it’s — if you put a protectionist wall around it. You’re going to get — his policy is really very, very naive, old-fashioned, 1960s.”
Not a good sign in the global economy of the 21st century.
I sure hope people learn to see beyond the “change” rhetroic before November.
More Support
September 17th, 2008More Support
It’s A Growing Trend
The Associated Press reports this morning that a top fundraiser for Hillary Clinton, and member of the Democratic National Committee’s Platform Committee, is now supporting Senator John McCain for president.
Lynn Forester de Rothschild has said she thinks Democratic nominee Barack Obama is arrogant and has a problem connecting with average Americans.
Rothschild is a member of the DNC’s Democrats Abroad chapter and splits her time living in London and New York. She was one of Clinton’s top fundraisers, bringing in more than $100,000 for her presidential campaign. She built a multimillion-dollar telecommunications company before marrying international banker Sir Evelyn de Rothschild.
Rothschild plans to announce her support for McCain on today in Washington D.C.
Surrounded By Idiots
September 16th, 2008Surrounded By Idiots
But Not Surrendering
As I get older, I find it more and more difficult to comprehend the basis by which many Americans base their voting decision during presidential elections.
I mean, there are certain ideals we held in our late teens and early adulthood that some never seem to grow out of.
There are still people – adult people that is – considering topics such as access to legal abortions as a primary indicator whether they should support a candidate or not.
I’m not even stating my personal position on this topic in this post because:
- It’s not relevant.
- I’m not a moron.
The topic came to mind, however, because of recent protests against Sarah Palin and her strict anti-abortion stance. Those “protests” are misplaced, and misguided, of course – because Sarah Palin, even Vice President Sarah Palin, doesn’t legislate such laws, nor could she, or Senators McCain, Obama, or Biden change such a law.
Nonetheless, there stand the idiot protestors with the “Keep Your Hands Off Of My Body” signs.
This is nothing new in 2008 of course, and that’s why it becomes obvious just how asinine the whole topic is.
President Reagan, a true conservative, was as “anti-abortion” as anyone. Yet, Roe vs. Wade came through his 8 years unscathed.
So, over the last couple of decades, so many people have been out there, judging candidates on their pro-life/pro-choice stance, nobody was asking if they were good at their jobs. Were they going to provide good leadership? Could they be trusted to do their jobs in a timely and professional manner, during times of war, terrorist attacks, or a failing economy?
Instead, it was “Are you for or against abortion? Oh, OK, then I’m votin’ fer ya!”.
Morons.
And while they were out there voting for pro-life/pro-choice assholes, the financial market imploded.
Nice job. You are what we refer to as a “single-issue voter”, and you officially lose your “right” to vote.
Again, while this topic came to light because of “pro-choice” protesters, both sides are equally to blame. I would not vote for a president, even in part, due to their stance on abortion. Yet, too many do – and that covers supporters of both views.
I’d be happy to discuss or debate my beliefs on abortion elsewhere, but I simply feel that our political candidates have much bigger problems to address than this.
I’ve made it clear on this blog that I’ll be voting for John McCain. I’m not a big McCain supporter – he’s far too liberal for my liking. And I certainly have not hidden the fact that I like Sarah Palin, although she too is far from perfect. Either of them are more qualified for the position than Obama is, but even if they weren’t, Obama’s policies scare the shit out of me and I want to make sure that we have a country left for my children to enjoy. Senator Biden doesn’t scare me quite so much. He’s clearly more qualified for the presidency than Obama is, in the Gerald Ford sort of way.
Nonetheless, at the end of the day, Republican, Democrat… It’s the same shit, just a different pile.
Someday the Libertarians will come up with a viable candidate and make sweeping changes to how we view politics. Not this year though. I did vote for Bob Barr “way back” a couple years ago when he was an ultra-conservative Republican, and I do really like the man, but he’s no Libertarian.
I am neither Republican nor Democrat, but have voted for each over the years. They are simply two sides of the same coin. Sometimes one has better rhetoric than the other, but generally both are self-serving, and, at best, inept.
And make no mistake about it – both parties are equally responsible for that mess you see outside your window. So, Obama, running on a “well, we’re not Bush” platform isn’t really going to cut it.
The Democrats, including Obama, have controlled the legislative branch for the past 3 years and have accomplished exactly…. Nothing.
Nancy Pelosi is a joke.
Everyone thinks their “side” will save them from the evils perpetrated by the other side. Instead you just get a new brand of largess and pandering.
One way or another, in November we’re going to sort out all of this political bullshit. And our new ‘leader’ will take office in early 2009, and proceed with blaming someone else for the mess we’re in. Then they’ll say that more and more regulation is the answer – without trying to find out what the real problem was, or how to prevent it in the future. Facts are irrelevant. Actually, facts are an anathema. This is important only insofar as it can be used to gain political favors with the electorate and/or big name donors.
The rest of us basically get screwed and life goes on.
Not that anyone down at our level will care… They’ll still be voting for people based on pro-life/pro-choice qualifications.
Vote For Sarah
August 29th, 2008Vote For Sarah
I Mean, McCain
Senator John McCain has just brought my vote back to the Republican Party. Sorry Mr. Barr, but McCain’s selection of 44 year-old Alaskan Governor Sarah Heath Palin for Vice President trumps my otherwise Libertarian views.
Put me down as a definite McCain-Palin voter in 2008.
Well, this isn’t exactly true. I am voting for Sarah Palin – she just happens to be on the McCain ticket. Considering Senator McCain’s age, there’s a good chance that he might be a one-term president, placing (the hopeful) Vice President Palin at the top of the heap in 2012.
Why my love for Sarah?
OK, let’s get this out of the way, because you know damned well I’m thinking it… Sarah Palin is, in my humble opinion, smoking hot. This GILF (the “G” is for Governor – you figure out the rest) could charm the most evil communist dictators into submission with her smile.
She is the youngest governor of Alaska, ever. She is the first female governor of Alaska, ever.
She is a former Miss Alaska runner-up.
She isn’t afraid of going against the flow, even within her own party. Sarah first gained statewide attention because of her whistleblowing on ethical violations by Alaska state Republican Party leaders. Clearly, she has an honest heart and doesn’t just follow the Party line.
Sarah defeated the incumbent governor in the Republican primary, and then went on to win the general election.
As governor, Palin has maintained an approval rating in the 80s and 90s through 2007 and 2008. That’s not a type… 80%-90% approval rating. This is almost unheard of.
I’ve studied her energy policies and stand on social issues, and I’m on board with her in both arenas.
By choosing Sarah, John McCain has made a wise decision. She will be an asset to his administration, as well as the GOP in general.
I have no doubt that, given the chance, she could bring respect and dignity back to the Republican Party. Something that has been erased over the past 8 years or so.
Oh, and did I mention that she’s totally hot?
Remember, a vote for McCain in 2008 is likely to lead to:
Sarah 2012 – Palin For President
Mama Obama
June 5th, 2008Mama Obama
Black and White
While I personally could not care less about the race, or gender, of a presidential candidate – call me crazy, I’d prefer to cast my vote based upon the issues – it’s very clear that many Americans do care about race. Specifically, the race of Senator Obama.
I don’t recall ever hearing about McCain of Clinton being “white”, nor was there ever any suggestion that either of them should recieve votes because they are.
But, hardly an article is published, nor a news report spoken, without mention of the fact that Senator Obama is an “African American”.
A very large number of African American’s are so proud to have a “black candidate”. I guess, if I understand correctly, because he will “feel their pain” – you know, like Bill Clinton, our previous black president. We hear about what a great accomplishment it is that a black man will have the Democratic nomination.
The problem with this “race card” is that Mama Obama is as white as Hillary Clinton or John McCain. In fact, being from Witchita, Kansas, it could be argued that she’s even whiter. You can’t really get more white than the midwest, can you?
Senator Obama is as white as he is black.
It could be argued that this is a good thing… He should be equally compassionate to both blacks and whites. I’m not sure that I believe that, but it would be a valid argument.
The fact of the matter is, Obama’s father left the family (typical?) to study at Harvard when Barack was just two. The last time he saw his father was at the age of 10.
Being raised by his white mother – wouldn’t that make him even more “white”?
So, why do Time, Newsweek, CNN, and all of the Obama supporters insist upon portraying him as “black”, or as an “African American”?
Why is it if you challenge Obama’s position, you’re labeled as “racist” by his supporters? Are you racist against his black or white genes?
And, if you are a supporter of the Senator, don’t assume that “anti-Obama” Americans have chosen that position based upon his race. I am one of that group, and race has absolutely nothing to do with it (Condoleezza Rice was my first choice for president).
If you subscribe to Senator Obama’s socialistic views, follow your heart and vote for him, whether you’re black, white, or other.
On the other hand, if you are a more sensible person, vote for someone else – and keep race out of the equation.
Papa and Mama Obama
(Barack Obama Sr and Ann Durham)
Barr 2008
May 28th, 2008Barr 2008
Learn The Issues
It’s time to send a message to Washington and to America! The “lesser of two evils” can no longer be tolerated! Voters deserve to cast a vote for principle and, in 2008, there is only one hope for true, principled leadership in America and his name is Bob Barr.
Bob served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003 and continually fought to protect your civil liberties. During his service, Bob uncovered wide spread government spying, placed the Sunset Clause in the USA PATRIOT Act and was a House Impeachment Manager that led to the impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton for lying under oath in litigation related to Paula Jones.
Bob was also the first to call for the impeachment of President Clinton by sponsoring H.Res. 304.
Since leaving Congress, Bob continues to fight daily for the rights of all Americans. Bob serves on the board of the National Rifle Association and works with the American Conservative Union as well as having served on the board of the Libertarian National Committee.
I’m asking you to show your support for Bob and his presidential campaign by making a generous donation today. Your donation will help Bob move strongly towards November and allow him to challenge the other candidates and their ’status quo’ politics.
Please donate today and thank you for your time and support.
Think
May 25th, 2008Think
Differently, That Is
The following press release was just posted by the Libertarian Party moments ago.
Libertarian Party selects Bob Barr as 2008 presidential nominee
Former Congressman plans to take the White House as Libertarian candidate
Denver – The Libertarian Party has nominated former Congressman Bob Barr as its candidate for president for the 2008 election.
“I’m sure we will emerge here with the strongest ticket in the history of the Libertarian Party,” Barr stated in his victory speech shortly after being selected as the Party’s nominee. “I want everybody to remember that we only have 163 days to win this election. We cannot waste one single day.”
More than 650 Libertarian delegates met in Denver from May 22 till the 26 for the 2008 Libertarian National Convention. After six rounds of voting Sunday afternoon, Barr was selected as the Party’s presidential nominee.
“We’re proud to present to the American voters Bob Barr as our presidential nominee,” says Libertarian Party spokesperson Andrew Davis. “While Republicans and Democrats will fight for their own power in November, Libertarians will fight for Americans. Bob Barr is one of the strongest candidates in the Party’s 37-year history, and we look for him to have an enormous impact in the 2008 race. Republicans and Democrats have good reason to fear a candidate like Barr, who refuses to accept the ‘business-as-usual’ attitude of the current political establishment. Americans want and need another choice, and that choice is Bob Barr.”
The Libertarian Party is America’s third largest political party, founded in 1971 as an alternative to the two main political parties. You can find more information on the Libertarian Party by visiting www.LP.org. The Libertarian Party proudly stands for smaller government, lower taxes and more freedom.
For more information, or to arrange a media interview, please call Andrew Davis at (202) 333-0008 during normal business hours, or at (202) 731-0002 during any other time. For an interview with the Barr campaign, please contact Audrey Mullen at (703) 548-1160.
Now is the time for a REAL change. Or, do you really just want more of the same two-party monopoly?
